Skip to content

Hiby FC3 Review – Portability is Key

Comparisons –

Xperia 5 II: I thought it would be apt to compare the FC3 to the Sony’s integrated headphone jack. The FC3 does have a lower OI, noticeable on low-impedance multi-driver IEMs, though the Sony does have a sub 2-ohm OI which remains acceptable for most gear. The Sony in return offers a black noise floor but also has markedly less output power. Though sufficient for IEMs, the FC3 is a substantial improvement for headphones and offers much more volume.

Tonally, the FC3 is much more linear and offers more headroom. The 5 II has good linearity with a bit of additional body and warmth through its bass and midrange. The FC3 is more defined and dynamic, with a generally more succinct note presentation. Both have similar soundstage expansion, the FC3 has noticeably sharper imaging. Indeed, the FC3 is a good step up, but for IEMs, the integrated jack does quite well with low noise and a mostly flat sound.

Cozoy Takt-C ($109): The Takt-C provides a slightly fuller and more musical sound than the more reference-orientated FC3. Though both have a similar bass presentation, the Takt-C offers a slightly more dynamic and controlled experience. The midrange is also slightly more enticing on a tonality level with a bit more body on the Takt C. The FC3 is slightly more neutral in tone here and also a bit more defined.

The Takt-C has more accurate vocal size and is slightly more coherent. In terms of treble, the FC3 is a bit more linear here, delivering slightly better fine detail retrieval. Both offer similar extension, the FC3 having a slight edge. The Takt-C has a wider soundstage while the FC3 has better layering. The Takt-C offers a black noise floor where the FC3 has a little hiss on the most sensitive gear.

A&K Dual DAC Cable ($149): The Dual DAC Cable offers a more robust sound. It has better sub-bass extension and a bit more kick alongside slightly better control in the bass. The midrange is slightly more lush on the AK cable though at the cost of some definition relative to the cleaner and more linear FC3. The AK cable does have a nice timbre to my ears, with more appropriate vocal size though it is more tonally coloured overall.

The FC3 has a slightly crisper treble response, the AK being smoother and slightly more resolving of fine detail. I also find the AK cable to offer a bit more headroom and a noticeably larger soundstage. The AK cable also offers a slightly lower noise floor though still has some hiss on the most sensitive gear. Of note, its 2-ohm output impedance does not make it as ideal for low-impedance multi-driver earphones as the FC3.

Verdict –

It seems like there’s a new hyper-portable DAC/AMP on the market every time I refresh my Facebook feed, every manufacturer wants to get their foot in the door and most implement almost identical hardware too. Though I’m sure there are minute differences between each ESS SOC-based offering, I cannot say with confidence that any option will provide a huge impact on the end user experience. Hiby is evidently no stranger to either the hardware or software side of design and this means the strength of their product is in its streamlined execution. The FC3 is very easy to use with intuitive controls, great app integrated and clear LED indicator system. Hiby have also priced it competitively, substantially undercutting boutique models and achieving parity with other value options. For a reasonable sum, you receive a well-rounded source that offers flexible controls, file support and volume. Its highly clean and neutral sound maximises synergy and showcases nice refinement if at the cost of a relatively intimate soundstage and a little background hiss on the most sensitive gear. The FC3 also doesn’t quite match pricier competitors when it comes to driving power which will limit pairings mostly to IEMs and portable headphones. For portable use, however, the FC3 is hard to fault and feels like a good package for the asking price.

The FC3 is available on HiFiGO (International) for $69 USD at the time of writing. I am not affiliated with Hiby or HiFiGO and receive no earnings from purchases through this link.

8 thoughts on “Hiby FC3 Review – Portability is Key Leave a comment

  1. Would love to hear your feedback on my predicament, if you will, I already have the Tempotec Sonata HD Pro and paid for the Mqa plug in in UAPP. With that said, would it still make sense for me to get the FC3?

    Like

    • Hey Ken,

      I’m not sure what your routine is like, but imo you will have a better experience upgrading to a larger source for home listening and using the Sonata for portable use. The FC3 will provide a marginal upgrade over the Sonata.

      Best,
      Ryan.

      Like

  2. Thanks for the prompt reply, Ryan. For now, I’m looking for a portable setup. The headphones that I use are the 1more Over-ears and Meze 99 Neo. Both aren’t really that power hungry. Alternatively, I am considering the Topping NX4 as well.

    Like

  3. Actually, the FC3 Hiby sounds great if you stream Tidal, etc, when it is streaming and you can tell by the color if you are getting the MQA, it sounds like you have the Portable taken care of but for my Win 10 PC I did not think it could sound this good Thank You rsdno

    Like

    • Thanks for your comment, I find the FC3 is definitely a well-rounded source and the pricing is not too bad either. But then again, so are most these days. If it has the capability to decode MQA and you have a streaming service that supports it, then you can do no wrong listening using it. Glad you’re enjoying your unit, hope it serves you well for a long time.

      Best,
      Ryan.

      Like

Leave a comment

Coffee Equipment Reviews

prosumer espresso equipment, machines, roasters and gadgets

Audio123 Reviews

Reviews on IEM, Earbud, Cable, DAC/AMP, DAP

AccessibleAudio.Co

Audio reviews for everyone!

pt.AUDIO

We do sound, better

Twister6 Reviews

Twister6 Audio Gear Reviews